Skip to main content

Recent comments

Submitted by dale thiel on

Permalink

-very nice box very, nice arrangment it looks like a pattern we use in montana only chenille instead of krystal dub and it works all year long even under the ice.But i might have to try it this way

Wolfie,

Oh I have drowned cameras! My list is almost as long as yours (4 PowerShots), and I even documented it and wrote a bit about it:

Three down and one to go. The front one works, the rest are all dead or semi dead:

This one is definitely under! Notice the shrimp!

Post mortem reconstruction...

And more here: How to drown a Canon PowerShot

And speaking of shutter buttons... that reminds me of my old Minolta 7000i film camera, which had this shutter issue... due to contact with salt water it was fairly unwilling to expose pictures (not great for a camera) and for a long time I had to pouch my lips around the shutter and blow moist breath into the button mechanics to get it to come alive and be able to fire.

I routinely did that for a year or so until a friend lent me some contact cleaner on a spray can, which cleaned out the oxidization that must have formed on the contact. It worked like a clockwork since then - and still does.

So it does cost to bring cameras near the water. But on the other hand it also gives you hundreds of great pictures.

Martin

Submitted by 1737246363 on

Permalink

Thanks Pete, for sharing, also from Italy.
A sense of irony is, in my opinion, guarantee of freedom... and, to my eyes, some of your 'freestyle' tying are full of sense of irony!

Laura

Submitted by Wolfie on

Permalink

Great article - totally agree that fishing without a camera is almost as bad as not taking a rod along! Howeve my experience with cameras exposed to water is about the complete opposite of yours! In four years I have killed outright 5 Canon powershots: A75, A400, A410, A420,G10 and an Olympus E-1 DSLR, and had rain cause problems with my E-300 shutter button.
I now have a Pentax K-7 with a 18-55 WR lens (water-resistant version) and it has survived 6 trips out wading in saltwater getting splashed by waves and smeared with fish slime. And it is smaller and cheaper than any Nikon,Canon or even Olympus DSLRs for the same sealed construction of body and lens. But my ultimate fishing camera would be like a Panasonic GF-1 with sealed body and lens for compact size and high image quality.

Submitted by Stephen Clarke on

Permalink

I hpoe this little aside helps someone. In New Zealand it is illegal to carry two rods. I therefore have guided and balanced a 5 wgt TCR for spinning and have a reel seat for the Stella 1000, I use with it, in the correct position above the fly reel seat. It is simpler and legal to carry two reels. At the risk of appearing a heretic on this board I far prefer to spin and the fly reel remains unused for long periods. The tube flys I use most often have no opinion or preference as to which system places them in the water, nor do the fish I catch and return.

bwlodge-folks,

While we appreciate hearing news from Ireland and seeing pictures of nice fish from beautiful streams, we are not really fond of undisguised advertising on our discussion board.

I did a quick search for the contents of the posts above and found word-for-word identical postings in several other fishing forums.

You are more than welcome to post stories and pictures from your rivers and lodge here, but please write them for this board and its users and don't simply paste stories which are cross-posted to dozens of other sites too - including your own.
I will consider such postings as pure spam and delete them in the future as they seem to serve no other purpose than to attract visitors and potential customers to your web site and lodge.

We appreciate almost any participation in our forums, but not simple commercial marketing.

Martin

Submitted by bill manser on

Permalink

anyone know of the originator of the deerfield or westfield streamer? i have an original of each and would like to know more about them. they were originally purchased from a shop on the westfield - in westfield ma in the 50's....

Submitted by Omar Ali on

Permalink

In my opinion and from my experience fishing snakeheads back in Malaysia, Tube Flies should survive the ferocious teeth of the Giant Snakehead better than the normal flies. On one of the fishing trip I lost(damage due to the sharp teeth of the Giant Snakehead a.k.a. Toman, as it is called in Malaysia) dozens of flies.

Submitted by Anders on

Permalink

Martin,

We can definitely agree on Reersø. I have spend many many hours there. Always a pleasure.

I saw the "Bend Rod" article when posted and was very inspired. I'm used to the standard "put-the-fish-down-and-take-a-picture" but want to go further than that. Some times this just does not give the fish nor the picture the credit it should have! And why not if it is possible? Running around with the camera in the bag is just not optimal, when you bring it with the intention to use it. It seems I need to do 2 things:

1: Bring the camera:
Good Idea to tuck it in the waders. Normally I have had it in the standard bag from the kit, but I can see a point in just letting it hang inside almost ready for action.

2: Let the rod bend:
The more easy part ;-). Already have an appointment at the south point this Easter with a silver bullet I was kind enough to release "long distance" this fall.

I will let you know, when the 2 things occur at the same time ;-)

Anders,

The D200 IS sealed, and as I said: I would not treat any camera as I treat my D200! But in general I think most cameras can take more than we think or fear.

Too bad about the fish and good to hear that things are starting to happen out there! Reersoe is one of my personal favorite spots to fish (for the non-Danes: it's a nice peninsula in Denmark known for good coastal fishing).

Tuck your D60 inside you waders. That will require a full dive from you before it gets wet, and such dives are rare after all.

That will enable you to do some POV-shots like the ones shown in this article or the picture below.
Notice the drops on my 900 dollar fisheye lens!
It happens... but it's just water.
I wiped it off after my fishing (which was very good that day), and it's still as good as new.

Martin

Submitted by 1737246363 on

Permalink

Martin,

Thanks for the thorough answer! I did not know whether it was because the D200 was specially sealed - I don't wanna see my D60 die on me like a some phones do after a little swim. But as you describe, maybe I should give more credit to the designers and use it as it is intended too.

Tired of the feeling when getting home and looking through the pictures not finding a single one on the water describing the atmosphere of that day. Two trouts at Reersø this thursday and no pictures..

I'll think I will start on the plastic-bag-trick and maybe go the full monthy - naked camera - later.

By the way: Nice layout on the pictures in the article!

Third Springer is caught on the Blackwater Lodge beats
The third springer of the season was taken on Sunday, March 14 by Larry Sheridan (Dungarvan) who gillies for the Lodge.
He released the fish which weighed about 12lb & was taken on black Flying C at the top of the Island Stream on Kents.
It didn't have sea-lice but very fresh. He saw a couple more springers there as well.
Unfortunately no picture as he doesn't carry a camera with him.
The river is now at summer level - 0.36m on the Ballyduff gauge. Perfect fly order.
Lots of kelts being caught on flies as small as size 8.
For the latest info: Fishing report page http://www.ireland-salmon-fishing.net/FishingReport/fishingreport.htm

[u:137ab0550b]The Second Springer is Caught on the Blackwater Lodge beats[/u:137ab0550b]
Error, the image cannot be shown: http://www.ireland-salmon-fishing.net/Galleries/2010/gallery2010/march1…
Bass fishing guide Michael McCormack from Wexford with the second fish of the season from the Lodge beats. It was sea-liced & weighed in at 10.2lb.
It was taken on Silver Bullet on the Green Bank on Upper Kilmurry.
Michael saw 3 or 4 more fresh fish as well during the day.
He was the only rod out on the river today - one springer for one rod day cain't be bad!
For the latest info: Fishing report page http://www.ireland-salmon-fishing.net/FishingReport/fishingreport.htm

Fisherman,

You can fish from a boat as long as you have the state license for saltwater fishing, which is very inexpensive.

You can launch the boat from many beaches where you can get close enough to the water. You can also use boat ramps in harbors, but you will probably have to pay a small fee for that.

You can see more about the license rules here:
http://www.fisketegn.dk/?language=en

Martin

David,

Very nice looking fly!

The key to get a fly to ride hook point up is not always weight, but rather a "sail" or "rudder", which points up. The wing on a Crazy Charlie or Gotcha it a good example.

This will act as a guide to the fly as it sinks, much like the tail on a kite in the wind. So making sure your flies aren't flat, but has most of its extensions - like the crab claws and legs - pointing upwards, might do the trick.

Martin

Thank you for your help ,Martin and pike. I`m decided for breathable .It`s always worth to learn from experienced bodies. Dear Martin (and or any fisherman from Denmark) I got another problem. We all fishermens are crazy. Me and my friends thought about taking boat (6 m long ,all safety equipement on board) . Could you explain me regulations about fishing from the boat. We want to be correct and take care about the rules. Nobody from yor embassy could help mi because they think they are not out of mind like we ,fishermans. Please help us .Best regards. Fisherman.

Glenn Parkin wrote:
nice looking fly t.z. simple for you maybe :) but I think I will give it a shot

Here´s how you do it - in case you wonder - after laying a thread base tie in a small bunch of deer hair by the eye and cover with thread going backwards to the hook bend at about opposite to the barbe point. Form a ball shape body segment with dubbing and fold the deer hair forwards. Secure with 2 or 3 wraps, fold 3 or 4 hair fibres backwards and keep tying the rest of deer hair forward by covering with thread. Repeat the process - dubbing and folding over - with just less dubbing so you get a smaller segment. Check some Ant pics or the real things in your area.They vary in proportions. Whip finish under the deer hair so a bunch extends over the hook eye. The rest is trimming with scissors and crushing the legs a bit.

Anders,

I think few photographers would submit their camera to what I have offered my D200 (as you can see above). My camera has rusty screws, severe problems synchronizing a flash using the hot shoe due to oxidizing and is slowly loosing the rubber cover. It's seen some action and is clocking steadily towards its shot number 40,000, but it still takes great pictures.

I wouldn't recommend other people being quite as rough, but on the other hand I see way too many photographers not realizing that their camera is supposed to be out in the air! And a bit of rain will not hurt any camera.
Cameras in general have no problems with drops, splashes and dirt, and your D60 like most SLR's are surprisingly robust. I have a D40, which is a small plastic camera compared, and it runs like a clockwork in spite of the things I have done to it. Armed with my new small 35mm f1.8 it will live a swell life inside my waders while I'm fishing this coming season, and it will most likely get its share of saltwater and sand - and most likely take some nice pictures for me.

But if you want a makeshift protection for your camera, simply use a plastic bag large enough for the camera and your hands. Cut off one corner of the bag to create a hole for the lens, slip the camera into the bag, the lens through the hole and a rubber band around the lens hood to secure the bag. You can reach into the bag and operate the camera and see both the viewfinder and display well enough to shoot. The camera is quite well protected from the rain.

Martin

Submitted by Stephen Clarke on

Permalink

I tied 20 clinch knots last night and 20 trilenes, then pulled them to failure. The clinch knots all failed at the knot and noticebly with less pressure needed. Only 2 trilenes failed at the knot 18 were snapped mainlines. I used 4lb Xcelon.

Submitted by Tom Cooper on

Permalink

When I first started fly tying back in the 60's, there wasn't the wealth of materials, instructions, or patterns for that matter for a young lad to choose from that exist today. Herter's,L.L. Bean's, Orvis, Dan Bailey's,and Eric Leiser's Fireside Angler were my main sources. The Hornberg tied by one of l.L. Bean's local Maine tiers was one of the first flies I tried to imitate. Unfortunately, I have never successfully imitated the style of Hornberg I received from them in the mail nor have I ever seen anyone ever come close to that magnificent little fly. The Mallard feather was lacquered and rested completely on top of the hook in a typical wet fly fashion. The width of the Mallard feather makes it extremely difficult to tie the feathers without either cutting them or making an ugly mess. The original I received was absolutley perfect and although I have come a long way from those early days of teaching myself to tie flies, I have never been able to duplicate that masterpiece. I would love to know if anyone has any information on that particular version of the Hornberg and who that master tier might have been

Submitted by Anders on

Permalink

Nice article Martin! I have been thinking of this situation for some time, when I have bought my Nikon D60 on fishing trips. Can It handle the environment or does the camera have to be specially sealed? I have so far saved my camera from rainy weather and haven't found any simple and effective protection yet. Ideally I would be able to bring my camera over the shoulder when fishing on the coast - but is this possible?

Since you got this far …

A money box
The GFF money box

… I have a small favor to ask.

Long story short

Support the Global FlyFisher through several different channels, including PayPal.

Long story longer

The Global FlyFisher has been online since the mid-90's and has been free to access for everybody since day one – and will stay free for as long as I run it.
But that doesn't mean that it's free to run.
It costs money to drive a large site like this.
See more details about what you can do to help in this blog post.